Governor's Veto Kills FL Child-Sharing and Alimony-Reform Bill

“Current law directs a judge to consider the needs and interests of the child first when determining a parent plan,” Gov. Scott wrote in his veto message. “This bill has the potential to up-end that policy in favor of putting the wants of a parent before the child's best interest by creating a premise of equal time-sharing. Our judges must consider each family's unique situation and abilities and put the best interests of the child above all else.”

Another part of the legislation would have altered the state's alimony laws by creating formulas and timetables, and by doing away with permanent alimony. The alimony and child-sharing proposals were combined into one bill only late in the legislature's session, a move that turned some proponents of each proposal away ' though not enough to doom passage. With his veto, Gov. Scott not only signaled his opposition to an assumption that equal time sharing between parents is best in most cases, but also confirmed his distaste for cutting off alimony payments to those in need: He had vetoed a similar alimony reform measure in 2013 after noting that its retroactive application would have tampered with the settled economic expectations of many already-divorced Floridians.