Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

'Implementation Day' Marks Rollback of Significant Nuclear-Related Sanctions on Iran

By Lisa A. Prager, Betty Santangelo, Gary Stein, Peter H. White, Lara Covington, Seetha Ramachandran, Michael P. Court and Matthew J. Moses
June 01, 2016

On Jan. 16, 2016, Secretary of State John Kerry confirmed the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) determination that Iran implemented its key nuclear-related measures as described in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Thus, Jan. 16, 2016 was “Implementation Day” under the JCPOA. As a result of Iran verifiably meeting its nuclear commitments, the United States lifted certain sanctions primarily applicable to non-U.S. persons, including foreign entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons, as discussed below. In addition, the United States removed over 400 individuals and entities from the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List), the Foreign Sanctions Evaders List (FSE List) and/or the Non-SDN Iran Sanctions Act List (NS-ISA List).

Secondary Sanctions in Certain Sectors

The U.S. government rolled back certain nuclear-related “secondary sanctions” on Iran: 1) as applied to non-U.S. persons and entities; and 2) with respect to the eight business categories listed below. These secondary sanctions applied even to non-U.S. entities that were not owned or controlled by a U.S. person and that were outside OFAC's jurisdiction. Although such entities could not be penalized in an enforcement action, they faced other sanctions such as being denied access to the U.S. financial system. Under the JCPOA, non-U.S. persons, including U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities, are now eligible to participate in transactions or activities subject to the sanctions lifting under the JCPOA only to the extent that the transactions or activities are exempt from regulation or authorized by OFAC. Specifically, the United States lifted the following eight categories of secondary sanctions as related to Iran:

  1. Financial and banking-related activities;
  2. Underwriting services, insurance or re-insurance;
  3. Energy and petrochemicals;
  4. Shipping, shipbuilding and port operators;
  5. Gold and other precious metals;
  6. Graphite, metals and software for integrating industrial processes;
  7. Automotive sector; and
  8. Sanctions on associated services for each of the categories above.

Accordingly, for example, a Swiss corporation may purchase, sell, transport or market petroleum, petrochemical products and natural gas from Iran, including transactions with the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC). A Swiss subsidiary of a U.S. company may also engage in transactions with Iran's energy sector, provided the U.S. parent is not involved in the Iran-related operations or decision-making, as explained further below.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.