Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Jan. 16, 2016, Secretary of State John Kerry confirmed the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) determination that Iran implemented its key nuclear-related measures as described in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Thus, Jan. 16, 2016 was “Implementation Day” under the JCPOA. As a result of Iran verifiably meeting its nuclear commitments, the United States lifted certain sanctions primarily applicable to non-U.S. persons, including foreign entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons, as discussed below. In addition, the United States removed over 400 individuals and entities from the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List), the Foreign Sanctions Evaders List (FSE List) and/or the Non-SDN Iran Sanctions Act List (NS-ISA List).
Secondary Sanctions in Certain Sectors
The U.S. government rolled back certain nuclear-related “secondary sanctions” on Iran: 1) as applied to non-U.S. persons and entities; and 2) with respect to the eight business categories listed below. These secondary sanctions applied even to non-U.S. entities that were not owned or controlled by a U.S. person and that were outside OFAC's jurisdiction. Although such entities could not be penalized in an enforcement action, they faced other sanctions such as being denied access to the U.S. financial system. Under the JCPOA, non-U.S. persons, including U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities, are now eligible to participate in transactions or activities subject to the sanctions lifting under the JCPOA only to the extent that the transactions or activities are exempt from regulation or authorized by OFAC. Specifically, the United States lifted the following eight categories of secondary sanctions as related to Iran:
Accordingly, for example, a Swiss corporation may purchase, sell, transport or market petroleum, petrochemical products and natural gas from Iran, including transactions with the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC). A Swiss subsidiary of a U.S. company may also engage in transactions with Iran's energy sector, provided the U.S. parent is not involved in the Iran-related operations or decision-making, as explained further below.
The secondary sanctions relief does not apply to transactions involving persons on the SDN List. Transactions involving such persons remain prohibited after Implementation Day.
General License H
OFAC's Iran sanctions program originally applied for the most part only to U.S. persons and entities, and not to foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies. The program was subsequently expanded such that, by 2012, a foreign entity owned or controlled by a U.S. person was prohibited from knowingly engaging in any transaction, directly or indirectly, with the Government of Iran (GOI) or any person subject to the jurisdiction of the GOI to the same extent as a U.S. person. For this purpose, a foreign entity is deemed owned or controlled by a U.S. person if the U.S. person: 1) holds a 50% or greater equity interest by vote or value in the entity; 2) holds a majority of seats on the board of directors of the entity; or 3) otherwise controls the actions, policies or personnel decisions of the entity.
The JCPOA, pursuant to General License H, now authorizes U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities to engage in transactions with Iran, subject to certain limitations. This authorization is not limited to specific economic sectors or industries. The limitations to General License H, however, are substantial. Among other things, General License H does not authorize transactions involving:
OFAC's General License H also authorizes U.S. persons (e.g., senior management) to establish or alter corporate policies to the extent necessary to allow U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities to engage in transactions involving Iran that would otherwise be prohibited. U.S. persons, however, may not be involved in the Iran-related day-to-day operations of a U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity, including by approving, financing, facilitating or guaranteeing any Iran-related transaction by the foreign entity, regardless of the business sector of the activity. In addition, General License H authorizes U.S. person employees and outside legal counsel and consultants to provide training, advice and counseling on the new or revised operating policies and procedures, provided these services do not facilitate illegal transactions.
Furthermore, General License H authorizes U.S. persons to make available certain “Authorized Business Support Systems.” This includes any automated and globally integrated computer, accounting, email, telecommunications or other business support system, platform, database, application or server broadly available to, and in general use by, the U.S. parent company's global organization. For example, a “sales lead database” on a U.S. server that is broadly available to, and in general use by, the U.S. parent company's non-U.S. entities would be considered “globally integrated” for the purposes of this license.
Licensed Activities for U.S. Persons
Aircraft Parts
Simultaneous with Implementation Day, OFAC issued a Statement of Licensing Policy (SLP) establishing a favorable licensing policy regime through which U.S. and non-U.S. persons may apply for a specific license authorizing certain transactions related to the sale of commercial aircraft and related parts and services to Iran, provided those transactions do not involve SDNs. Individuals and entities, on a case-by-case basis, may be issued a license allowing them to: 1) export, re-export, sell, lease or transfer to Iran commercial passenger aircraft for exclusively civil aviation end-use; 2) export, re-export, sell, lease or transfer to Iran spare parts and components for commercial passenger aircraft; and 3) provide associated services, including warranty, maintenance and repair services and safety-related inspections for commercial passenger aviation. Cargo aircraft, state aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, military aircraft, and aircraft used for general aviation or aerial work are not eligible for licensing under the SLP.
Imports of Iranian-Origin Carpets and Foodstuffs
In addition, effective Jan. 16, 2016, Iranian-origin carpets and foodstuffs, including pistachios and caviar, may be imported into the United States without prior written authorization. This general license covers: 1) carpets and other textile floor coverings and carpets used as wall hangings that are classified under Chapter 57 or Heading 9706.00.0060 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States; and 2) foodstuffs intended for human consumption that are classified under Chapters 2-23 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. However, U.S. persons remain prohibited from paying Iranian companies for these imports by crediting or debiting an Iranian account. Therefore, payment mechanisms under this general license typically involve a third-country bank or money service business to finance the purchase from a third country.
Civil and Criminal Penalties
OFAC may take a variety of enforcement actions for sanctions violations, including imposing civil monetary penalties and making criminal referrals to appropriate law enforcement agencies for investigation and/or prosecution. The penalties for such violations can be substantial and vary based on the sanctions program and other factors. For violations of many of the Iranian sanctions regulations, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) provides for a maximum civil penalty of the greater of $250,000 or twice the amount of the transaction that is the basis of the violation. Each prohibited transaction is viewed as a separate violation. For criminal violations, which involve a willful violation or willful attempt to violate Iranian sanctions regulations, IEEPA provides for a maximum penalty of $1 million, imprisonment of 20 years, or both. Proceeds derived from an IEEPA offense are also subject to forfeiture.
Sanctions in Place After Implementation Day
Companies that want to engage in new business involving Iran must continue to exercise caution. Iran remains designated as a state sponsor of terrorism, and the JCPOA does not alter that designation. Indeed, the rollback of sanctions described above can be “snapped back” if Iran fails to comply with the JCPOA going forward. Moreover, the U.S. government continues to enforce sanctions against persons and entities involved in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their delivery means, including ballistic missiles. On Jan. 17, 2016, the day after Implementation Day, OFAC added 11 entities and individuals to the SDN List for their involvement in procuring goods for Iran's ballistic missile program. Finally, on Jan. 20, 2016, FinCEN, one of the U.S. Department of the Treasury's lead agencies in the fight against money laundering, called on U.S. financial institutions to “give special attention to business relationships and transactions with Iran” because of the risk of terrorist financing.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.