Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The legendary and now deceased Prince ' singer, songwriter, producer and man of myriad other talents ' kept a bevy of high-profile lawyers busy during the past three decades. Prince developed a somewhat complicated relationship with the Internet, and fought to protect his brand and music against unauthorized use. See, “Prince Had a Complicated Relationship with the Internet,” Washington Post (April 21, 2016). And for that he needed lawyers, lots of them.
Michael Elkin, chair of Winston & Strawn's copyright, entertainment and digital media practice, said he handled some of the first suits filed in the mid-1990s against websites on behalf of Prince, a fierce copyright defender whose music generally is hard to find on streaming services or YouTube. Elkin would travel around the world representing the rock star in more than 20 cases between 1995 and 2004, an era when the increased prevalence of online music began encroaching on the earnings potential of many artists.
In 1993, Prince changed his name to an unpronounceable character, a combination of the symbols for male and female. The difficulty in writing or printing what would become known as “The Love Symbol” was particularly vexing for Prince's lawyers seeking to file briefs on his behalf.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.