Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Litigators' Perspectives on Prince

By Brian Baxter
June 01, 2016

The legendary and now deceased Prince ' singer, songwriter, producer and man of myriad other talents ' kept a bevy of high-profile lawyers busy during the past three decades. Prince developed a somewhat complicated relationship with the Internet, and fought to protect his brand and music against unauthorized use. See, “Prince Had a Complicated Relationship with the Internet,” Washington Post (April 21, 2016). And for that he needed lawyers, lots of them.

Michael Elkin, chair of Winston & Strawn's copyright, entertainment and digital media practice, said he handled some of the first suits filed in the mid-1990s against websites on behalf of Prince, a fierce copyright defender whose music generally is hard to find on streaming services or YouTube. Elkin would travel around the world representing the rock star in more than 20 cases between 1995 and 2004, an era when the increased prevalence of online music began encroaching on the earnings potential of many artists.

In 1993, Prince changed his name to an unpronounceable character, a combination of the symbols for male and female. The difficulty in writing or printing what would become known as “The Love Symbol” was particularly vexing for Prince's lawyers seeking to file briefs on his behalf.

Sharon Mayo, a longtime commercial litigation partner at Arnold & Porter in San Francisco who is now senior counsel at the firm, represented Prince in a dispute shortly after he ditched his name and became The Artist Formerly Known as Prince. The adoption of the symbol presented a problem for caption pages on court filings. “This was before the advent of off-the-shelf drawing software, and one of our secretaries had to hand draw and then photocopy his symbol onto the caption so that we could tell the court who we represented,” Mayo said in an e-mail.

The Artist certainly had his eccentricities. At times, he stopped paying his lawyers. In 2010, Los Angeles-based entertainment boutique McPherson Rane sued him seeking $50,000 in unpaid fees. See, “Purple Pain: Lawyer Sues Prince, Claiming Unpaid Fees,” The AmLaw Daily (Aug. 6, 2010). The following year it was New York-based firm Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler who filed suit against Prince Rogers Nelson over another $708,687 legal tab. See, “No Stranger to 'Controversy': Prince Sued by Patterson Belknap,” The AmLaw Daily (March 2, 2011). “[Prince] could be a challenging client ' he wanted perfection,” Elkin said. “But he was a creative genius, and he would use his brain to think of new and inventive ways to challenge his lawyers.”

Elkin admitted that he didn't always heed Prince's advice. And when he didn't, Prince, whom Elkin called a “highly responsive” client, wasn't shy about letting him know. “He would say to me, 'Michael, if you were in my band, I'd tell you that you're playing the wrong tune,'” said Elkin, a former vice chair and litigation chief at now-defunct Thelen who in 2007 joined Winston & Strawn, where he currently heads the firm's New York office.

Prince's displeasure would sometimes manifest itself in other ways. Elkin recalled once being urgently summoned in the middle of a snowstorm to Prince's Paisley Park Studios outside Minneapolis in Chanhassen, MN. Elkin said Prince brought him to a conference room for what turned out to be a three-hour tirade against the U.S. judicial system. Then he was free to return to New York. “'You can go now,'” Elkin recalled Prince saying shortly before he left.

Prince rarely called Elkin at work, but one time he did, and Elkin, then at Thelen, thought another lawyer in his office was playing a prank on him. “I get a call from someone who said, 'Hello, this is The Artist,'” Elkin recalled. “And so I respond with, 'Go fuck yourself.' This went on for a minute or two before I realized it was actually Prince on the phone. I apologized profusely ' I was so humiliated and embarrassed ' but Prince just went on talking. And then he just hung up. He never said goodbye, he'd just hang up.”

Elkin's role representing Prince began with a referral from longtime entertainment industry transactional lawyer Gerald “Jerry” Edelstein of Edelstein, Laird & Sobel in Los Angeles. (In December 2015, singer-songwriter Dolly Parton made a public plea to get Edelstein a kidney transplant.) In New York, Elkin often worked with William Leibowitz, another entertainment lawyer who advised Prince.

“We spent a lot of time in the courtroom,” said Elkin of Prince, noting that besides defending his client in depositions or his various copyrights, Elkin also handled contract disputes and advised the singer's companies, including doing some personal injury work related to Prince's chain of Glam Slam nightclubs. And then there were the assignments that came from Prince's entourage, like helping out a stepbrother after he got in an altercation with his ex-wife at a club.

Elkin, who has done legal work for other legendary musicians, including Billy Joel, Bob Dylan and James Taylor, said that as his practice transitioned to more institutional clients, he and Prince went their separate ways.

Other firms such as Davis Wright Tremaine, Fox Rothschild, Greenberg Traurig and Kaye Scholer also did work for Prince over the years, with L. Londell McMillan being one of Prince's most trusted advisers.


Brian Baxter is the Deputy Web Editor for our ALM sibling,'The American Lawyer.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.