Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Organized and meaningful data has been leveraged in progressive organizations for years, but now that data and information is highly accessible and easily consumable via the ever-expanding digital mesh, enterprise-level expectations and related legal business impact have been elevated. With this new reality come many questions: What data should we collect? What needs to be measured? By whom? And, how can metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) not only affect change but provide a common communication and measurement base for firms, their clients, and technology suppliers alike?
Recently, myself (Director of Information at Keesal, Young & Logan (KYL)) and Peter Zver (Tikit North America's President), had the opportunity to present a business information “measure to manage”-themed educational panel session as part of ALM's 12th Annual Law Firm Chief Information & Technology Officer's Forum (CIO Forum). Our panelists, including industry pundit and founder of Procertas Casey Flaherty, Google's head of legal operations Mary O'Carroll, and Tikit's customer value engineer Ryan Steadman, discussed how to best organize and use data in ways that are useful to attorneys, firms, and clients, while promoting positive behavioral change that impacts the bottom line and client relationships. Specifically, we drilled down into real world 'measure to manage' examples including time data, system utilization, technology proficiency, client KPIs and pricing.
This article takes into account Peter's (PZ) technology innovator perspective and my (JH) law firm technology and operations experience as it relates to the panel session. In my additional role as this year's CIO Forum Chair, I wanted to make sure to go beyond law firm concerns and challenges and focus on what in-house legal operations professionals are looking for in terms of law firm service delivery. The topic of baseline metrics that can be measured and subsequently managed and leveraged across the legal ecosystem definitely fit this core objective.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.