Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Recent Uses of Software and the DMCA
One of the motivations for enacting the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 17 U.S.C. '1201 et seq., was the acknowledgement by Congress of “the ease with which pirates could copy and distribute a copyrightable work in digital form was overwhelming the capacity of conventional copyright enforcement to find and enjoin unlawfully copied material.” See, Universal City Studios v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001). Among the provisions created to redress this rampant infringement were the prohibitions against: 1) removing copyright management information (CMI); and 2) circumventing technological measures in place to prevent infringement. See, 17 U.S.C. ”1202(c), 1201(a). CMI is defined in the DMCA as information communicated with a copyrighted work which identifies the nature of the copyright. In one notable case involving CMI, a news organization was found to have violated the DMCA by knowingly distributing pictures with CMI that included authorship credit attributed to the wrong photographer. These two DMCA prohibitions are included in a broader category of protections afforded copyright holders called digital rights management (DRM), which is an access control technology used to prevent misuse of copyrighted works.
Each is controversial. Anti-circumvention preventions have arguably brought about unintended consequences, including jeopardizing fair use and chilling free expression and scientific research, and CMI has alleged to have been defined so broadly as to include logos, which could theoretically allow a trademark holder to invoke DMCA protections. As another of the many examples, almost 17 years after the passage of the DMCA, there remains a dispute as to whether CMI is only protected if it involves the use of a “digital” technological measure, such as CMI embedded in the software, or whether it is also protected when used in an “analog” measure, such as the author manually affixing the author's name to the work. See also, Murphy v. Millennium Radio Grp., 650 F.3d 295 (3d Cir. 2011) (printed credit on image that is not part of an “automated copyright protection or management system” is CMI). Another source of disagreement is whether a “simple” copyright notice constitutes CMI within the meaning of the DMCA.
Copyright holders can ' and do ' respond that DRM is designed to comport with the animating purposes of the DMCA, which requires ingenuity and flexibility in creating new mechanisms to prevent infringement, and that the anti-circumvention provisions are replete with exceptions to the restrictions, including for reverse engineering, research activities, security investigations and use by non-profit organizations. So the argument goes, such exceptions ensure that free speech and innovation is not unduly burdened by the anti-circumvention rules that amply protect the copyright holder's interests.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?