Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Supreme Court's recent decision in Bouaphakeo v. Tyson Foods, 577 U.S. ' (2016) was decidedly not the sweeping ruling many practitioners anticipated. Nevertheless, the decision provided useful guidance for class-action litigants regarding the proper use of representative evidence ' i.e., that which requires the trier of fact to draw conclusions about one subset of the class, or even an individual putative class member, based on an analysis of a different part of the class. Likewise, the decision afforded litigants an interesting glimpse into the Court's disposition regarding certification where, by definition, the class includes unharmed members.
With respect to representative evidence, Bouaphakeo marks a clear departure from the recent trend of Supreme Court jurisprudence that tightened class-certification standards. While the Court was reluctant to endorse any hard and fast rules that manifestly favor employees or employers, the Bouaphakeo decision arguably softened the strict stance articulated by Justice Scalia just five years earlier in Dukes v. Wal-Mart.' With respect to uninjured class members, Chief Justice Roberts' concurrence provides defendants with a possible roadmap to certification challenges.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.