Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Most cases that involve fraud really are not fraud cases at all. Those are the situations in which one doctor examines a worker and concludes that he or she is fully recovered from whatever injuries he or she sustained, while another doctor ' usually a treating physician ' says that the worker remains symptomatic and is still not able to go back and perform the job he or she had when the injury occurred.
There is another side to fraud. That component deals with employers and insurance companies. For this reason, it is pleasing to see that prosecutors in Pennsylvania have targeted employers as well as employees who violate the Workers' Compensation Act.
Case in Point
In one case I handled, the employer claimed that his workers were independent contractors and that he had no obligation to purchase workers' compensation insurance. Nevertheless, when he applied for motor vehicle insurance, he listed those same “independent contractors” as employees.
The tragic part is that my client suffered catastrophic injuries and was forced to obtain benefits from the Uninsured Employers Guaranty Fund. The UEGF, which was created by the legislature to provide coverage for injured workers whose employers have evaded the law by failing to purchase the mandatory workers' compensation insurance, paid nearly $290,000 in benefits as of June 2015.
Fortunately, the Montgomery County, PA, district attorney prosecuted the employer, who pleaded guilty to the crime of failing to procure workers' compensation insurance. The employer was also ordered to repay the UEGF and while it is unlikely the UEGF will ever be fully reimbursed, this prosecution does send a message to other employers that they should think twice before deciding to misclassify workers to save money on workers' compensation insurance.
Daniel J. Siegel writes for The Legal Intelligencer, an ALM sibling publication in which a longer version of this article also appeared.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.