Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Antitrust and Corruption
In March 2016, nine Brazilian executives received prison sentences from a Brazilian court ranging from 10 to 19 years for their roles in the $35 million Petrobras Scandal, a scheme among construction and engineering companies to submit fraudulent bids to, and bribe agents of, the state-owned oil company, Petroleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobras). Several former Petrobras directors and a manager were also sentenced, some to more than 20 years in prison. The companies' legal troubles did not end there. Currently, Brazil's antitrust authority, the Council for Economic Defense, is investigating 21 companies and 59 executives for antitrust violations in connection with the same Petrobras contracts. The antitrust case was unearthed while investigators were looking into corruption issues. In the U.S., Petrobras investors filed civil suits against the company. And in 2015, Brazilian prosecutors notified the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) of evidence that several of the companies' actions may implicate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
Meanwhile, in Romania, the authorities have started to focus on pharmaceutical companies for anti-competitive practices. The modus operandi? Paying for state-employed doctors' attendance at Congresses and for “participation” in allegedly questionable clinical trials, ostensibly to induce them to prescribe the company's drugs rather than similar drugs from other companies ' also potential FCPA violations. Catalin Lupasteanu and Livia Ispas, Doctors Who Supported Drugmakers Rewarded With Holidays in France, Canada, USA, MEDIAFAX.RO (July 28, 2015), http://bit.ly/247d13w. These cases are just two examples of antitrust and corruption intersecting within the same set of facts. A company may think it is facing exposure in an antitrust investigation, but ultimately may find itself charged with corruption. With increased agency scrutiny on a global scale, coupled with increased cooperation between prosecutors abroad and in the United States, companies should seize the opportunity now to reassess their antitrust and FCPA compliance policies and procedures.
The FCPA and the Sherman Antitrust Act
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.