Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Audit Committee Reporting Obligations

By William L. Floyd
July 01, 2016

The increasingly responsible role of the independent audit committee of a board of directors has become, and will continue to become, more complex and more important. Various regulatory authorities continue to focus on and expand the role and responsibility of the independent audit committee, including not only its oversight role, but also its disclosure requirements. Among the regulatory authorities, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and stock exchange rules focus on the expanding role and responsibility of the independent audit committee.

Background

Since the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), regulatory focus has been directed toward improving auditor independence and the role of the audit committee as the gatekeeper and responsible entity for engaging, overseeing and monitoring the performance of independent auditors. In addition, since the creation of the PCAOB, literally hundreds of inspections of registered public accounting firms have occurred and continue to occur. Many of the inspections have resulted in finding significant deficiencies in audits examined, raising audit quality issues. Also, there is an increased focus on the part of investors and proxy advisers on the governance of audit firms, their independence, their objectivity, and thus the role of the audit committee in selecting the audit firm and overseeing these responsibilities.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

"Holy Fair Use, Batman": Copyright, Fair Use and the Dark Knight Image

The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.