Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Online Discount Pricing Policies Face Increasing Scrutiny
Consumers, particularly online shoppers, are constantly looking for a discount. Given that “nobody pays retail anymore,” online retailers are facing increased challenges when comparing their own discounted prices to original or suggested retail prices. As a result, retailers are being accused with greater frequency of exaggerating discounts in comparison to inflated original prices. Publications such as the New York Times have recently highlighted this phenomenon, which can create a false impression that consumers are getting significant savings. See, “It's Discounted, but Is it a Deal? How List Prices Lost Their Meaning,” New York Times (March 6, 2016). A Times survey concluded that many promoted products were not truly being offered at the advertised list price. Those findings are consistent with a number of lawsuits filed against leading online and brick-and-mortar retailers which challenge such practices.
Retail purchasing and pricing practices have changed dramatically with the Internet, but the law has not always kept pace. In the click of an Enter button, consumers now have the ability to use search engines to scan prices advertised by literally hundreds of online retailers. Yet, when looking for guidance about the legal requirements for establishing and comparing to a suggested retail price, retailers are forced to rely on 50-year old guidelines and a patchwork of similarly outdated and confusing state pricing laws. These requirements, while well meaning, were drafted prior to the existence of the virtual marketplace in which retailers now compete, and consumers now shop. State regulators and class action lawyers are now recognizing the gap between statutory requirements and the current marketplace, and are challenging retailers' pricing practices that they believe violate the governing law.
The FTC Guidelines
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
"Holy Fair Use, Batman": Copyright, Fair Use and the Dark Knight
The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.