Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
If you follow politics at all, you know that the United States Congress has essentially been mired in gridlock for quite some time, failing to adopt significant legislation in any area, including employment law. Congress' inaction has left a void for states and municipalities to fill, and more and more frequently, they are filling this void by adopting equal pay legislation, raising the minimum wage, or instituting paid parental leave.
The recent proliferation of paid sick leave mandates, which are typically popular with the general electorate, is another perfect example. To date, five states ' California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Vermont ' have adopted paid sick leave laws that affect a significant number, if not all, of the employers in those states. In addition, numerous cities, including New York City, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle, Washington, DC, and most recently, Minneapolis, have hopped on the bandwagon by adopting paid sick leave ordinances.
The rise of such laws and ordinances is not likely to stop any time soon, as many other states and cities, including, but not limited to, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Chicago, and Los Angeles, have recently introduced and/or are contemplating paid sick leave measures. This patchwork of laws can create administrative and employee relations headaches not only for employers in these jurisdictions, but for employers in multiple jurisdictions or those who send their employees to work in these jurisdictions. To help employers understand what they are facing when it comes to paid sick leave laws, this article outlines how most of the paid sick leave provisions operate, addresses some common compliance pitfalls, and provides advice on compliance and future planning for all employers.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.