Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
No Stay of Eviction for Non-Paying Tenant
In the New York case of Berezanskly v. Daddy O's BBQ & Sports Bar Inc., L&T 53441/14, NYLJ 1202759979373, at *1 (Civ., RI, Decided June 3, 2016), a restaurant tenant who had failed to pay rent to its landlord for nearly two years was denied a stay of eviction.
The tenant's failure to pay the landlord nearly $200,000 had left the landlord without adequate funds to pay its mortgage, and the leased property had gone into foreclosure. The landlord sought payment from the tenant in a previous proceeding in which the tenant acknowledged it owed the landlord $168,000; that proceeding ended with a money judgment in the landlord's favor and a warrant of eviction against the tenant. The money was never paid to the landlord, however. In this later action, the receiver of the property wanted the tenant gone, but the tenant asked the court for a six-month reprieve because it was in negotiations to buy the mortgage notes from the bank that was foreclosing. The court was not amused and noted that the tenant had shown no evidence of payment on the landlord's money judgment, nor of quitting the property as it had been ordered to do.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?