Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A federal judge in San Jose has denied class certification in a long-running case claiming that Facebook Inc. disclosed users' personally identifiable information to advertisers when they clicked on some Facebook ads. In Re: Facebook Privacy Litigation, Case No. 5:10-cv-02389.
U.S. District Senior Judge Ronald Whyte wrote that individualized nature of the plaintiffs' claims weighed against class treatment, but the reasoning behind his decision will remain a mystery for a while. All but three pages of Whyte's 19-page order issued in June were redacted. The judge wrote that he'd give the parties two weeks to seek to seal any “confidential information” revealed in his order.
The ruling comes in a case that dates back to 2010, when several separate proposed class actions were consolidated before then-U.S. District Chief Judge James Ware. The suits alleged Facebook sent so-called “referer headers” to advertisers when users clicked a Facebook ads. Plaintiffs alleged that prior to July 2010 the headers transmitted information could allow an advertiser to identify the user who clicked a given ad despite Facebook's promises to only share anonymized data about users.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?