Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On May 5, 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a proposed rule that would limit the use of mandatory arbitration in certain consumer finance contracts. Specifically, the proposal focuses on such arbitration provisions that proscribe consumers from filing class action lawsuits. It would also permit consumers to bring class action suits against banks and financial service providers, even if the parties have an existing agreement that waives a right to such relief in favor of binding arbitration.'
The New York Times has described the use of mandatory arbitration as “stacking the deck of justice.” Conversely, according to business groups, class actions are inappropriate in small claims of this nature because they involve “issues that consumers actually care about, such as alleged overcharges [and] are unlikely to be classable because they are individualized disputes.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.