Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The European Commission concluded more than six months of negotiations both within the EU institutions and with the U.S. on July 12 with the announcement that an agreement had been reached on the Privacy Shield scheme to transfer data from the EU to the U.S.
What Is Privacy Shield?
The Privacy Shield scheme was proposed in February 2016 to replace the Safe Harbor scheme, which was struck down by the European Court in the first Schrems case ( Schrems 1 ) in October 2015. Maximillian Schrems v. Data Prot. Comm'r, ECLI:EU:C:2015:650, CJEU 6 Oct. 2015, Case C-362/14 (Schrems 1). The Schrems 1 case was brought by an Austrian law student, Maximilian Schrems, against Facebook. Mr Schrems initially complained to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner about the way in which Facebook was transferring his data using Safe Harbor. The Irish Data Protection Commissioner felt that she did not have the power to investigate since the European Commission had put the Safe Harbor scheme in place. The court disagreed and also felt that the entire Safe Harbor scheme was unlawful.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?