Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Since its introduction in 2005, Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code has increasingly featured in foreign bankruptcy proceedings. While it is now a well-trodden path for foreign office holders seeking more traditional ancillary assistance, Chapter 15 continues to evolve as enterprising U.S. legal advisers and foreign office holders team up to deploy progressively novel cross-border strategies.
For the sophisticated insolvency professional outside the U.S., expanding one's playbook to include Chapter 15 is a must. As the recent decision discussed below demonstrates, Chapter 15 enables foreign office holders to avail themselves of the benefits of the expansive U.S. discovery powers and procedural rules. This often proves advantageous to those pursuing assets or information about fraudulent actors. Furthermore, U.S. bankruptcy courts have recently demonstrated a willingness to exercise their discretion under Chapter 15 to permit foreign office holders to bring foreign law claims in the United States. When that happens, Chapter 15 courts effectively expand the jurisdiction of the foreign proceeding, allowing the office holder to pursue foreign law claims against defendants beyond the reach of the court where the foreign proceeding is pending.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.