Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Since its introduction in 2005, Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code has increasingly featured in foreign bankruptcy proceedings. While it is now a well-trodden path for foreign office holders seeking more traditional ancillary assistance, Chapter 15 continues to evolve as enterprising U.S. legal advisers and foreign office holders team up to deploy progressively novel cross-border strategies.
For the sophisticated insolvency professional outside the U.S., expanding one's playbook to include Chapter 15 is a must. As the recent decision discussed below demonstrates, Chapter 15 enables foreign office holders to avail themselves of the benefits of the expansive U.S. discovery powers and procedural rules. This often proves advantageous to those pursuing assets or information about fraudulent actors. Furthermore, U.S. bankruptcy courts have recently demonstrated a willingness to exercise their discretion under Chapter 15 to permit foreign office holders to bring foreign law claims in the United States. When that happens, Chapter 15 courts effectively expand the jurisdiction of the foreign proceeding, allowing the office holder to pursue foreign law claims against defendants beyond the reach of the court where the foreign proceeding is pending.
Alternatively, the option of pursuing a foreign law claim in a U.S. court may be attractive to office holders in jurisdictions with limited discovery powers or cost-shifting features that allow elusive recovery targets to slow down proceedings and drive up costs with jurisdictional challenges, thereby reducing recoveries to bona fide creditors.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?