Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
GEORGIA
Real Estate Investors Plead Guilty to Bid Rigging and Fraud
On June 29, 2016, two Georgia real estate investors pled guilty to criminal antitrust violations, mail fraud and conspiracy related to allegations of bid rigging and fraud at public foreclosure sales. According to the indictment, Jon Stovall Jr. and Michael Stock conspired with other real estate investors in Georgia to refrain from bidding against each other at public real estate foreclosure auctions in order to artificially suppress the prices. The parties arranged payoffs among themselves to share the profits, prosecutors said.
Stock and Stovall are among 20 defendants who have been hit with charges originating from a DOJ investigation into bid-rigging and fraud in the Atlanta area; 18 have either pled guilty or agreed to do so. According to Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Renata Hesse, head of the DOJ's Antitrust Division, foreclosure auction fraud “take[s] money that rightfully belonged to homeowners and lenders.” By suppressing prices at these auctions, Stovall and Stock seized money from “the bank, and more importantly, the home owner in financial distress.”
According to the indictment, after purchasing the foreclosed homes from the bank, the co-conspirators would conduct “secret, second auctions, open only to members of the conspiracy, to bid for title to rigged foreclosure properties.” They would then distribute the surplus profits among the rest of the group. Prosecutors allege that the fraud had been ongoing in Georgia since October 2008.
Under the plea agreement, the government recommended a prison sentence of eight months, along with fines and restitution in excess of $65,000 for Stovall and Stock.
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.