Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Within the first week of its release, the enhanced-reality game Pok'mon Go garnered 21 million users in the United States alone. The location-based game received praise for getting people out of the house and harsh criticism as a nuisance and for its role in accidents. Among the litany of legal issues the game raises is whether players can hold the game developers at Niantic liable if they walk off cliffs, crash their cars, illegally cross the border or happen upon a land mine.
Niantic, the game's California-based developer, has potential liability for designing a game where it is foreseeable that players may injure themselves as a result of pursuing Pok'mon. In the California Supreme Court case of Weirum v. RKO General , 15 Cal. 3d 40 (1975) (http://bit.ly/2buW5XE), the state high court held that a radio station with a large teen audience was not freed from liability for designing a contest that required participants to drive about in search of one of the disc jockeys. The court found the station liable where, in the course of one such contest, a minor participant negligently forced another car off the road, killing the car's occupant.
The Weirum court determined that it was foreseeable that the contest would lead to injury or death. In addition, in the California case of Strange v. Entercom (Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty.), a jury found a radio station liable for wrongful death where, in an ill-conceived contest, people were encouraged to drink huge amounts of water in order to win a Nintendo Wii, resulting in the death of contestant Jennifer Strange. Notably, Strange was not found comparatively negligent for having voluntarily participated in the contest.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.