Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When it comes to crises, businesses practically tie themselves in knots trying to avoid any potential conflict.
We see this scenario play out the same way time and time again. A company's executive responds to a reporter's query with a pat “no comment.” A virulent rumor makes the rounds on social media only to be met with radio silence from the brand. A business moves to quietly settle a bogus lawsuit rather than expose itself to even a whiff of bad publicity. Burying your head in the sand will not make a crisis go away. It will only make the situation worse. What's more, by avoiding ' rather than confronting, controlling, addressing and resolving ' problematic situations, businesses miss out an opportunity to show their true worth, to prove that they are battle-tested and poised to stand the test of time.
You might not be able to control when a crisis happens, but you can control how you respond, provided you've taken the time to prepare. While every crisis is different, there are a few key steps to follow to ensure that brands or businesses not only survive a crisis, but bounce back stronger.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?