Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Federal Circuit: Halo Electronics Sent Back to District Court
On Aug. 5, 2016, a Federal Circuit panel of Judges Lourie, O'Malley, and Hughes issued a unanimous decision, authored by Judge Lourie, in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., Case Nos. 2013-1472, 2013-1656. The case was on remand from the Supreme Court after its June 13, 2016 decision, which held that the Federal Circuit erred in applying the “unduly rigid” test for enhanced damages under the framework in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (en banc). The Federal Circuit, following the Supreme Court's guidance, vacated the district court's original ruling declining to enhance damages, reasoning that that decision was made under the now-abandoned Seagate test.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.