Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At Reed Smith, we represent leading companies in everything from complex litigation and cross-border transactions to crucial regulatory matters, and we've been using Relativity since 2012 to help us tackle these projects and more.
Many know the Relativity platform as a tool that assists with litigation, specifically moving data across the Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM), from legal hold, collection, and processing all the way through document review and production. However, its capabilities extend far beyond that. Over the years, we've found that Relativity is flexible and customizable enough for us to do almost anything. We encourage others to start thinking outside the box of traditional document review, too.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.