Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Insurer Agrees to Pay Nearly $3 Million Above Policy Limits
Apparently concerned that it had left itself open to a medical provider's bad-faith suit, Georgia's MAG Mutual Insurance has agreed to pay a winning plaintiff the full $4.9 million judgment awarded, in spite of the fact that the clinic's combined insurance policies with the company placed a $2 million ceiling on its liability.
The medical malpractice case was brought by the family of Ok Hui Smith, a Korean War refugee who married an American soldier, became an American citizen and raised a family with him. At the age of 78, Smith sought treatment from her primary care physician for a toenail fungus. Her doctor prescribed Nizoral, a potent drug that, according to the FDA, should not be used to treat mild fungus complaints because of its potential for causing liver problems. Smith had been taking the drug for 4 ' months when her liver and kidneys failed; her doctor had checked her liver function just once during treatment. The doctor admitted his fault and a jury was asked only to decide damages. The defense asserted that, because of the decedent's advanced age, damages should be lowered, but the plaintiff side argued quality of life. David Krugler, the Smith family's attorney, explained: “Mrs. Smith was an extraordinary person. She learned English, became a U.S. citizen, became a master seamstress, gardener, cook. … We believed strongly in the family and the case. We knew the jury would get the value of this woman's life and that the loss of that life was really tremendous. They got it.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?