Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Prisoner Who Did Not Disclose Funds Loses Right to Refile Med-Mal Claim
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that the Wisconsin district court that dismissed with prejudice a prisoner's suit for deliberate indifference to medical needs and for medical malpractice did not err; the prisoner had sought permission to litigate in forma pauperis, but did not disclose that he had money in a trust account. Kennedy v. Huibregtse, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13667 (7th Cir. 7/27/16).
The plaintiff prisoner sought damages from the defendant doctors who had treated him while he was in a state prison in Wisconsin. He claimed injury due to medical malpractice and deliberate indifference to his medical needs, under 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The plaintiff asked not to have to pay the usual court fees and costs in advance ' in legal terms, he sought to leave to litigate in forma pauperis ' in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ” 1915(a), (b). He claimed that he had only $10, when in fact he had more than $700 in his prison account and $1,400 in a trust account held outside the prison, consisting of back child support payments he had been paid.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?