Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b><i>Online Extra:</b></i> British Billionaire's Suit Over Alleged Leak Offers First Test of Privacy Law

By Zoe Tillman
September 20, 2016

Gilbert Chagoury's story has all the elements of an international political thriller. Chagoury, a British billionaire and philanthropist who has given millions of dollars to the Clinton Global Initiative, was denied a visa last year to enter the United States because, according to the U.S. government, he was suspected of supporting terrorism.

Chagoury denies the allegation, saying the U.S. Department of State relied on bad intelligence. And now he's suing federal agencies that he claims leaked information about him to a reporter.'His suit'is thought to be the first case brought under the Judicial Redress Act, which President Barack Obama signed in February, and could test whether the privacy measure has much bite. The law gives citizens of the European Union the right to file lawsuits in U.S. courts against federal agencies for alleged Privacy Act violations.

According to Chagoury's suit, filed on Sept. 15 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, news coverage about the visa issue led banks to refuse to do business with him.

Edward McAndrew, a privacy and cybersecurity lawyer at Ballard Spahr in Philadelphia who is not involved in the case, called Chagoury's complaint “a dandy of a first lawsuit.”

“If the allegations of the complaint can be proven, it does appear that there would be a violation of the Privacy Act,” McAndrew said. “That's a big 'if,' of course, because the main question under the Judicial Redress Act is whether there's been a willful or intentional disclosure of protected information by a government agency.”

McAndrew said he'll be watching to see if the government pushes back against disclosing information to Chagoury. There are a series of exemptions the government can invoke to shield or restrict access to documents that relate to law enforcement investigations or national security. Whether Chagoury is able to get the documents and other evidence he wants will show if the Judicial Redress Act has “teeth,” McAndrew said.

Chagoury's lead attorney, Stewart Baker of Steptoe & Johnson LLP in Washington, agreed that getting information from the government will be a challenge.

“There are bound to be a lot of unanswered questions about how the law will be administered and how the Justice Department will litigate,” Baker said. “But being first also gives us the advantage of helping to shape the law in useful ways and gives us the opportunity to point out where we think the government or the Justice Department is not acting consistent with the spirit of the agreement with the EU.”

Chagoury says that a Los Angeles Times reporter gained access to internal FBI records and information from law enforcement sources to write a story about Chagoury's visa application being denied in September 2015. The Times reported that Chagoury was suspected of helping raise money for Hezbollah, an accusation that Chagoury denies.

None of that information would have been available to the reporter “but for an unlawful leak on the part of the defendant agencies,” Baker wrote in the complaint.

Unsure of who allegedly leaked information to the reporter, Chagoury sued several agencies, including the FBI, Justice Department, CIA and State Department. Representatives from those agencies declined to comment or were not immediately reached.

Chagoury claims that the leaked information and subsequent news article triggered “what amount to financial sanctions” by the government. He said that because U.S. banks are skittish about doing business with someone accused of wrongdoing, client accounts maintained on his behalf in a U.S. bank by his attorney were closed. According to his lawsuit, it's also become difficult for him to transfer money to the United States to pay expenses on properties he owns in California.

The Judicial Redress Act was passed by Congress as part of a broader agreement with the European Union to protect data shared by law enforcement agencies across the Atlantic. McAndrew said that a lawsuit over media leaks involving a high-profile figure such as Chagoury likely wasn't the scenario Congress had in mind at the time, but “it is a very, very interesting first example of how a plaintiff might attempt to seek redress for harms of this type.”


Zoe Tillman is a reporter for the National Law Journal, an ALM sibling of Cybersecurity Law & Strategy.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.