Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Last month, we reviewed Google's Project Aristotle, an intensive research project that identified factors that create excellent collaboration in teams (see http://bit.ly/2cHcpEx). While Google's People Analytics Division was able to spotlight some prerequisites for a climate of collaboration (“psychological safety,” empathy and “equality in terms of conversational turn-taking”), it did not define practical action steps for implementing effective collaboration once these prerequisites are present. So all across the landscape of the legal profession, frustrated leaders' voices continue to cry out, “All right, already. I get it. But what exactly do I do?”
Herein, we provide you with a nuts-and-bolts template of beguiling simplicity for getting those cats you're trying to herd to work more constructively together.
Fundamental Collaboration Principles
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?