Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
October 01, 2016

Marshall Tucker Band's Counsel Can Stay in Trademark Litigation

The U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina refused to disqualify counsel for The Marshall Tucker Band from representing founding member Doug Gray and the band's corporate entity in a suit against the band's former manager. The Marshall Tucker Band Inc. v. M T Industries Inc. (MTI), 7:16-00420. Ron Rainey, who managed the band for more than 25 years, owns a majority share of the group's music publishing company MTI. (Gray has a 20% stake.) The current case against MTI and Rainey involves a trademark dispute over the band's name. Citing the South Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, Rainey moved to disqualify from the litigation the plaintiffs' counsel, Michael Wilkes and Ellen Cheek, who previously performed legal work for MTI until 2010 but since then have served as counsel for the plaintiffs. District Judge Mary Geiger Lewis noted in part: “To the extent their representation of Plaintiffs has included work related to MTI, Plaintiffs' counsel have defined their role as being counsel for Gray, not MTI.” District Judge Lewis later noted: “Put another way, Plaintiffs' counsel's verbal and written declarations to Rainey consistently and unequivocally demonstrated to him that they solely represented the interests of Plaintiffs, and not those of Defendants.”


Ninth Circuit Sees No Access to Plaintiff's Song by Writers of Jessie J's Hit “Domino.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a summary judgment dismissal of a copyright infringement lawsuit over Jessie J's hit “Domino.” Loomis v. Cornis, 13-57093. The ruling focused on the issue of whether the writers of “Domino” had access to plaintiff Will Loomis's song “Bright Red Chords.” Loomis sued Jessie J and Universal Music in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. “Bright Red Chords” had garnered a MTVU “Best Freshman” video award, and MTV chose Loomis and his group as one of the best new bands of 2010. But Loomis's recording sold only 46 copies. “Domino” was written in 2011 by a group of songwriters that included Jessie J, Dr. Luke and Max Martin. Loomis claimed the “Domino” songwriters must have had access to “Bright Red Chords” through Universal Music A&R executive Sunny Elle Lee, who contacted Loomis's mother to obtain a copy of his song. But the Ninth Circuit noted: “Loomis did not dispute Defendants' statement that '[t]he five Domino Writers do not know, have never met, and have never received anything from Sunny Elle Lee.' He also did not dispute that 'Lee was not part of the work unit that created Domino.'” Loomis further claimed there was a triable issue of access based on Dr. Luke and Max Martin having worked in a Santa Barbara studio in 2010 on Katy Perry's Teenage Dream album, when “Bright Red Chords” was getting extensive radio play in that market. Here, the Ninth Circuit observed: “Dr. Luke and Max Martin were not participating in the relevant market ' the Santa Barbara local music scene ' during their brief stay in Santa Barbara. Their production responsibilities had nothing to do with listening to local radio, reading local press, or scouting local bands, and there was no evidence that they undertook any other activity in that market that created a reasonable possibility of access to Bright Red Chords.”


Sony Songwriting Contest Dispute Sent to Arbitration

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit agreed that a claim brought by a participant in a Sony Music songwriting contest should be sent to arbitration. Cort's-Ramos v. Sony Corp. of America, 15-1786. Luis Adri'n Cort's-Ramos entered a Sony Music contest in which singer Ricky Martin was to perform the winner's song during the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Cort's-Ramos submitted an original song and video, and signed the contest release and an affidavit that stated he was complying with the contest rules. Cort's-Ramos didn't win. Instead, he believed that Martin's recording “Vida” was similar to what he had submitted for the contest. Cort's-Ramos filed suit in the District Court of the District of Puerto Rico, alleging, among other things, that Sony fraudulently induced him into signing the contest agreements. The district court dismissed the suit with prejudice, finding no viable fraudulent inducement claim and pointing to the contest rules' mandatory arbitration clause (though Cort's-Ramos claimed that, despite signing the release and affidavit, he hadn't read the contest rules). Affirming, the First Circuit noted: “Given that the District Court, in dismissing the case, ruled that the claims were subject to mandatory arbitration, we agree that '[t]his is a peculiar use of the phrase 'with prejudice. ' However, that, in light of the District Court's order compelling arbitration, Cort's's claims 'ha[ve] not been extinguished but [have been] merely left to the arbitrator.'”

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.