Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The cases left on the docket feature a glitzy list of Manhattan-based fashion and media defendants ' Dolce & Gabbana, Ralph Lauren, Giorgio Armani, CBS, Simon & Schuster and many others. More than 40 “active” lawsuits in all, claiming that the companies' unpaid internship programs violated employment laws.
Both before and after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in its 2015 Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures decision, 11 F.3d 528 ' which vacated a class certification on the ground that “the question of an intern's employment status is a highly individualized inquiry” and thus curtailed the ability of unpaid interns to sue for back wages in federal court ' two New York firms have been teaming up to bring a slew of putative intern class actions in state court in Manhattan. For at least three years, Leeds Brown Law and Virginia & Ambinder have sought to take advantage of what they see as the state's “much more liberal interpretation” of what is required for class certification.
But now, even Virginia & Ambinder seems to be looking closely at how much life remains in bringing these actions in a New York court. That's because of a little-noticed trial court decision handed down in July by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kern, who effectively ruled that she would likely adopt something close to the stricter class certification standard laid out in Glatt.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.