Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Federal Circuit: Actual Controversy Existed When Patent Owner Did Not Know Existence of Specific Products
Asia Vital Components Co. v. Asetek Danmark A/S, No. 2015-1597 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 8, 2016) (precedential).
On Sept. 8, 2016 the Federal Circuit reversed the Eastern District of Virginia's dismissal of a patent dispute between Asia Vital Components Co. (AVC) and Asetek Danmark A/S (Asetek) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court found that the complaint did not plead sufficient facts to demonstrate a substantial controversy between the parties for a declaratory judgment, because the defendant-patent owner, Asetek, was not aware of the products at issue until the lawsuit was filed. Asetek initially wrote to AVC, alleging patent infringement over the manufacture and sale of a product called Liqmax120s, which actually was sold by another company unrelated to AVC.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?