Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Supreme Court Won't Block Senate Subpoena Targeting Backpage.com

By Marcia Coyle
October 01, 2016

The U.S. Supreme Court on September 13 denied a request by Backpage.com's chief executive to block a congressional subpoena to produce business documents in a sex trafficking investigation.

The High Court issued its decision in Ferrer v. Senate Permanent Subcommittee without comment. Justice Samuel Alito Jr. did not take part in the ruling.'

Lawyers for Backpage chief executive Carl Ferrer argued that the subpoena, issued by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs' permanent subcommittee on investigations, violated First Amendment rights. The subpoena compelled Backpage to provide details about, among other things, the company's policies for adult advertisements and data retentions and how the company reviews or blocks user accounts. Backpage, the nation's second largest online classified ad website, and Ferrer were represented by Davis Wright Tremaine and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.

A federal judge in Washington earlier ruled against Ferrer, requiring him to respond to the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. In the Aug. 5 decision, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer rejected Ferrer's argument that the Senate committee lacked the power to issue the subpoena.

However, Ferrer won an administrative stay from the D.C. Circuit on August 12 to temporary block the subpoena. In their petition for the stay, his defense lawyers framed the dispute as a fight over the First Amendment rights of companies such as Google and Facebook. “This case presents a novel First Amendment question of great significance: whether a Senate committee may use its investigative authority so as to intrude on the editorial processes of an online publisher of third-party content,” Ferrer's lawyers wrote in their petition. See , http://bit.ly/2dp8BLV.

But on September 2, the D.C. Court of Appeals refused to stay enforcement of the subpoena. See, Senate Permanent Subcommittee v. Ferrer, No. 16-5232.

A lawyer for Ferrer, Robert Corn-Revere of Davis Wright Tremaine, had argued that Ferrer's case was an example of a “disturbing” trend “of government actors issuing blunderbuss demands for documents to online publishers of content created by third parties (such as classified ads) in a manner that chills First Amendment rights.” The subpoena, Corn-Revere said, invaded “core editorial functions” that include how Backpage reviews, edits or deletes advertisements.

Senate legal counsel Patricia Bryan countered that Ferrer's refusal to comply with the subpoena was based on “a novel and sweeping interpretation of the First Amendment.” The trial court noted that the information sought by the subpoena was “highly relevant” to the subcommittee's investigation and potential legislation on Internet sex trafficking, Bryan noted in the Supreme Court.

Bryan said much of sex trafficking on the Internet takes place on Backpage's online commercial marketplace. “Given Backpage's prominent position in the online sex marketplace, the subcommittee has sought to learn about the business practices Backpage employs to protect against the use of its website by sex traffickers,” Bryan told the High Court.


Marcia Coyle writes for The National Law Journal , an ALM sibling of Internet Law & Strategy. She can be reached at [email protected] and on Twitter @MarciaCoyle. C. Ryan Barber contributed to this report.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.