Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
November 01, 2016

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York refused to grant sanctions against litigation counsel for a record production company and its owner that filed suit over an alleged improper use in the VH-1 series Love & Hip-Hop: New York of music by one of the plaintiffs' artist. Scrilla Hill Entertainment v. Dupree, 16-CV-490. Scrilla Hill filed suit claiming that the VH-1/Viacom program improperly aired music written by Scrilla Hill artist Young B. But, according to the court, the defendants later learned that an assertion by Scrilla Hill case counsel Israel Adam Burns that his clients were the owners of the rights to a Young B “Chicken Noodle Soup” music video, which appeared without sound in Love & Hip-Hop, “was false.” (In an interesting footnote, Southern District Judge Jesse M. Furman noted: “Burns represents (albeit improperly, in his unsworn memorandum of law) that he had claimed his clients owned the rights to the 'Chicken Noodle Soup' music video by relying in part on a 2006 royalty statement and invoice that showed UMG [the actual copyright owner of the music video] had paid Scrilla Hill artist royalties. [TV show producer and co-defendant] Eastern's only response is that the significance of the royalty statement is 'unclear.'”) Burns did file a voluntary dismissal notice, but the defendants decided to move for attorney fees sanctions against him on the ground that the plaintiffs' copyright infringement claim was frivolous. Burns responded by sending an insulting email to defense counsel. District Judge Furman determined that “the Court is reluctantly compelled to deny Defendants' application for attorney's fees. Judge Furman noted in part: “[S]ignificantly, Burns was put on notice that the claim was meritless only after Plaintiffs had filed the First Amended Complaint and, thereafter, Plaintiffs made no more filings other than the notice of voluntary dismissal.” The district judge continued: “And while Burns's dealings with opposing counsel outside the courtroom may have fallen particularly short of professional standards, awarding attorneys' fees requires more than that. It requires clear bad faith, which generally means persistent misconduct that rises above mere incompetence or petulance or even an unfortunate mix of the two. As a result, sanctions are not warranted based on Burns' present failings, however unfortunate they may be.”

*****
Stan Soocher
is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He is the author of Baby You're a Rich Man: Suing the Beatles for Fun & Profit (ForeEdge/University Press of New England) (http://amzn.to/1EWt79L). For more, visit www.stansoocher.com.

 

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.