Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided that an agreement between a book author and a publisher allowed a customer of distributor Barnes & Noble to retain a sample of the book in the “digital locker” the distributor provided to the customer. Smith v. BarnesandNoble.com LLC, 15-3508.
Louis K. Smith, author of a book titled The Hardscrabble Zone, entered into an agreement for Smashwords to publish an e-version of the book. Smith sued BarnesandNoble.com after he terminated his agreement with Smashwords. The copyright infringement suit complained about a licensed sample from Smith's book on one BarnesandNoble.com customer's digital locker. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that BarnesandNoble.com wasn't liable for either direct or contributory copyright infringement.
Declining to address the infringement issue “given the sparse facts of the case,” the Second Circuit instead noted: “The plaintiff had a distribution agreement that explicitly permitted the distribution of samples as promotional material.” The appeals court added: “[T]he agreement provides for the distribution of samples with a license 'for free, noncommercial use, duplication and sharing,' without provision to terminate the license for samples already distributed in the event the distribution agreement itself is terminated. Significantly, the distribution agreement authorizes paper samples as well as digital samples, and treats them alike. Since a customer who has a paper sample may obviously keep it, reread it, and make additional paper copies of it for noncommercial use at will, it follows that the agreement does not provide or imply that a person who obtained a digital sample would lose the license for free access upon termination of the distribution agreement.”
*****
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He is the author of Baby You're a Rich Man: Suing the Beatles for Fun & Profit (ForeEdge/University Press of New England) (http://amzn.to/1EWt79L). For more, visit www.stansoocher.com.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided that an agreement between a book author and a publisher allowed a customer of distributor Barnes & Noble to retain a sample of the book in the “digital locker” the distributor provided to the customer. Smith v.
Louis K. Smith, author of a book titled The Hardscrabble Zone, entered into an agreement for Smashwords to publish an e-version of the book. Smith sued BarnesandNoble.com after he terminated his agreement with Smashwords. The copyright infringement suit complained about a licensed sample from Smith's book on one BarnesandNoble.com customer's digital locker. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Declining to address the infringement issue “given the sparse facts of the case,” the Second Circuit instead noted: “The plaintiff had a distribution agreement that explicitly permitted the distribution of samples as promotional material.” The appeals court added: “[T]he agreement provides for the distribution of samples with a license 'for free, noncommercial use, duplication and sharing,' without provision to terminate the license for samples already distributed in the event the distribution agreement itself is terminated. Significantly, the distribution agreement authorizes paper samples as well as digital samples, and treats them alike. Since a customer who has a paper sample may obviously keep it, reread it, and make additional paper copies of it for noncommercial use at will, it follows that the agreement does not provide or imply that a person who obtained a digital sample would lose the license for free access upon termination of the distribution agreement.”
*****
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He is the author of Baby You're a Rich Man: Suing the Beatles for Fun & Profit (ForeEdge/University Press of New England) (http://amzn.to/1EWt79L). For more, visit www.stansoocher.com.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.