Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<i>Decision of Note</i>: Second Circuit Rules on e-Book Sample in Digital Locker
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided that an agreement between a book author and a publisher allowed a customer of distributor Barnes & Noble to retain a sample of the book in the “digital locker” the distributor provided to the customer. Smith v. BarnesandNoble.com LLC, 15-3508.
Louis K. Smith, author of a book titled The Hardscrabble Zone, entered into an agreement for Smashwords to publish an e-version of the book. Smith sued BarnesandNoble.com after he terminated his agreement with Smashwords. The copyright infringement suit complained about a licensed sample from Smith's book on one BarnesandNoble.com customer's digital locker. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that BarnesandNoble.com wasn't liable for either direct or contributory copyright infringement.
Declining to address the infringement issue “given the sparse facts of the case,” the Second Circuit instead noted: “The plaintiff had a distribution agreement that explicitly permitted the distribution of samples as promotional material.” The appeals court added: “[T]he agreement provides for the distribution of samples with a license 'for free, noncommercial use, duplication and sharing,' without provision to terminate the license for samples already distributed in the event the distribution agreement itself is terminated. Significantly, the distribution agreement authorizes paper samples as well as digital samples, and treats them alike. Since a customer who has a paper sample may obviously keep it, reread it, and make additional paper copies of it for noncommercial use at will, it follows that the agreement does not provide or imply that a person who obtained a digital sample would lose the license for free access upon termination of the distribution agreement.”
*****
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He is the author of Baby You're a Rich Man: Suing the Beatles for Fun & Profit (ForeEdge/University Press of New England) (http://amzn.to/1EWt79L). For more, visit www.stansoocher.com.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided that an agreement between a book author and a publisher allowed a customer of distributor Barnes & Noble to retain a sample of the book in the “digital locker” the distributor provided to the customer. Smith v.
Louis K. Smith, author of a book titled The Hardscrabble Zone, entered into an agreement for Smashwords to publish an e-version of the book. Smith sued BarnesandNoble.com after he terminated his agreement with Smashwords. The copyright infringement suit complained about a licensed sample from Smith's book on one BarnesandNoble.com customer's digital locker. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Declining to address the infringement issue “given the sparse facts of the case,” the Second Circuit instead noted: “The plaintiff had a distribution agreement that explicitly permitted the distribution of samples as promotional material.” The appeals court added: “[T]he agreement provides for the distribution of samples with a license 'for free, noncommercial use, duplication and sharing,' without provision to terminate the license for samples already distributed in the event the distribution agreement itself is terminated. Significantly, the distribution agreement authorizes paper samples as well as digital samples, and treats them alike. Since a customer who has a paper sample may obviously keep it, reread it, and make additional paper copies of it for noncommercial use at will, it follows that the agreement does not provide or imply that a person who obtained a digital sample would lose the license for free access upon termination of the distribution agreement.”
*****
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He is the author of Baby You're a Rich Man: Suing the Beatles for Fun & Profit (ForeEdge/University Press of New England) (http://amzn.to/1EWt79L). For more, visit www.stansoocher.com.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.