Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Former BET General Counsel Plays Role in Actress's Lawsuit
The longtime general counsel of Black Entertainment Television (BET) has a starring role in actress Gabrielle Union's contract case against the network. In a 17-page complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, Union alleges she was duped into working on more episodes of her BET Networks show Being Mary Jane — without a break between seasons four and five to allow her time to continue to pursue her film career between the TV production schedule. “It is outrageous that BET would treat one of its biggest stars in this manner after all she has done to support the network and contribute to its success,” the lawsuit states. Union v. Black Entertainment Television LLC, SC126543.
Union's contract with BET, a division of Viacom Inc., includes a provision stating that it can produce a maximum of 26 episodes of Being Mary Jane per season. According to Union's complaint, Darrell Walker, BET's former top lawyer, told her that this clause could not be modified, but assured her she would do just 13 episodes per season because BET couldn't afford to do more than that and has never done so in its history.
The lawsuit goes on to allege how BET later decided to shoot back-to-back seasons with 10 episodes each, making for a filming schedule for 20 episodes in a row. Or, as the lawsuit puts it, to “cram all of the episodes into a single season in order to fraudulently extend the term of Ms. Union's contract, with no additional consideration.”
Despite insisting that the provision about episodes per season could not be modified, Walker agreed to other modifications of Union's contract, the lawsuit alleges. For instance, BET agreed to an unusual requirement that “a BET executive be physically present on the set during taping of episodes of the series,” the complaint states.
BET responded to Union's lawsuit in a statement that said: “While we hold Gabrielle Union in the highest esteem, we feel strongly that we are contractually well within our rights and are committed to reaching a swift and positive resolution in this matter.”
Union's complaint also reveals that Walker has not been a full-time employee since June. Since then, Walker has been coming only to act as the “executive on set” to fulfill that portion of the contractual obligations for Union, she alleges. The purpose of this arrangement was to ensure that an executive with “intimate knowledge of the issues that have occurred” could dialogue with Union on behalf of BET, Union states.
The lawsuit goes on to claim that Walker conceded that what BET is trying to do is wrong but “that he no longer has any authority to act on behalf of BET to resolve the situation.”
Requests for comment to Walker and to other BET company representatives, including Viacom GC Michael Fricklas, went unreturned. But BET confirmed in an email that Walker is no longer with the company. There was no announcement of a new hire to fill his spot.
*****
Stephanie Forshee writes for our ALM sibling Corporate Counsel. She can be reached at [email protected].
The longtime general counsel of
Union's contract with BET, a division of
The lawsuit goes on to allege how BET later decided to shoot back-to-back seasons with 10 episodes each, making for a filming schedule for 20 episodes in a row. Or, as the lawsuit puts it, to “cram all of the episodes into a single season in order to fraudulently extend the term of Ms. Union's contract, with no additional consideration.”
Despite insisting that the provision about episodes per season could not be modified, Walker agreed to other modifications of Union's contract, the lawsuit alleges. For instance, BET agreed to an unusual requirement that “a BET executive be physically present on the set during taping of episodes of the series,” the complaint states.
BET responded to Union's lawsuit in a statement that said: “While we hold Gabrielle Union in the highest esteem, we feel strongly that we are contractually well within our rights and are committed to reaching a swift and positive resolution in this matter.”
Union's complaint also reveals that Walker has not been a full-time employee since June. Since then, Walker has been coming only to act as the “executive on set” to fulfill that portion of the contractual obligations for Union, she alleges. The purpose of this arrangement was to ensure that an executive with “intimate knowledge of the issues that have occurred” could dialogue with Union on behalf of BET, Union states.
The lawsuit goes on to claim that Walker conceded that what BET is trying to do is wrong but “that he no longer has any authority to act on behalf of BET to resolve the situation.”
Requests for comment to Walker and to other BET company representatives, including Viacom GC Michael Fricklas, went unreturned. But BET confirmed in an email that Walker is no longer with the company. There was no announcement of a new hire to fill his spot.
*****
Stephanie Forshee writes for our ALM sibling Corporate Counsel. She can be reached at [email protected].
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.