Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
There is a growing gap between company-sanctioned apps, services and programs and what employees are actually using. This gap is called “Shadow IT” and it is emerging as a major challenge for both in-house and outside counsel as well as CIOs, chief privacy officers and chief information security officers.
The emergence of Shadow IT can be attributed to the consumerization of business applications. Employees are accustomed to “App culture” — downloading or setting up solutions themselves rather than going through IT. The average employee actively uses 30 cloud services, including eight collaboration services, five file-sharing services and four content-sharing services, according to a study from cloud security firm SkyHigh Networks. Workers seek out the best cloud-based resources to do their jobs, and often resist traditional corporate tools which are less user-friendly and don't promote easy collaboration and sharing.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.