Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For Nursing Home Patients, No More Compelled Arbitration
On Sept. 28, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), issued a new rule that prevents nursing home facilities receiving federal funding from contractually depriving patients and their representatives of the right to sue in federal and states courts. This and several more changes were made in the 2016 CMS Final Nursing Home Rules, the first comprehensive update to these rules since 1991.
In recent years, many nursing home and long-term health care operators have included in their intake paperwork an agreement requiring that any complaints — including those for medical malpractice and wrongful death — be heard by an arbitrator, rather than a judge or jury. This has left many consumers not only constrained in their forum choices, but also unable to evaluate the quality of care they can expect at a particular nursing home because arbitration proceedings are not a matter of public record. According to a Sept. 28 blog posting authored by Andy Slavitt, Acting Administrator, and Kate Goodrich, M.D., M.H.S., Director, Center for Clinical Standards & Quality, CMS: “Since proposing to update these rules in July 2015, as part of the White House Conference on Aging, we have received and reviewed nearly 10,000 comments from the public. Many of the comments highlighted an important topic: concern about the use of required binding arbitration agreements that many prospective residents must sign before they are admitted to a long-term care facility.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?