Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As stated by the Joint Commission, which is responsible for accrediting and certifying tens of thousands of health care organizations in the United, States, good leadership is critical to the viability and success of any organization, and “how well leaders work together is key to effective hospital performance … .” See 2012 Hospital Accreditation Standards, Joint Commission on Accreditation Health.
In the 2009 white paper titled “Leadership in Healthcare Organizations, A Guide to Joint Commission Leadership Standards,” published by the Governance Institute, the four primary goals of leadership in a health care institution were identified as follows:
A significant factor that bears upon the issue of leadership in a health care institution and that impacts these cited goals of leadership is that of disruptive physicians and inappropriate behavior. Empirical data shows that disruptive and/or intimidating conduct by physicians can impair the quality of the delivery of patient care services. See “Revisiting Disruptive and Inappropriate Behavior: Five Years After Standards Introduced,” by Ronald M. Wyatt, Medical Director, The Joint Commission (Oct. 2, 2013); “Disruptive Clinician Behavior: A Persistent Threat to Patient Safety,” by Grena Porto and Richard Lauve, psqh.com (July/August 2006). So there is an established nexus between disruptive conduct and negative patient outcomes and medical errors.
The majority of health care providers, including physicians, strive to fully comply with codes of conduct applicable to a health care setting. Unfortunately, however, there are outliers who fail to conform to behavioral norms and who exhibit behavior that is disruptive and that undermines the quality of patient care. Certain departments and settings — for example, the surgical and emergency departments, and the operating room — are generally more susceptible to incidents of disruptive behavior.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?