Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Real Property Law
Costs and Fees Awarded for Cancellation of Frivolous Notice of Pendency Delidimitroupoulos v. Karantinidis, NYLJ 9/22/16, p. 20, col. 6 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action by a father-in-law against his son-in-law, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract, the latter appealed from Supreme Court's denial of his motion to cancel notices of pendency relating to real estate owned by his corporation, and his motion for costs and expenses. The Appellate Division modified to grant the motion to cancel the notices of pendency, holding that the complaint did not affect title to real property. The court also awarded costs and attorneys fees pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1310-1.1.
After the son-in-law sought a divorce, the father-in law brought an action for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, alleging that he held an ownership interest in a corporate entity that owns several parcels of real estate. He filed a notice of pendency with respect to each of those properties. The son-in-law, the principal in the corporations, moved to cancel the notices of pendency, and for costs and expenses pursuant to CPLR 6514(c) or costs and attorneys' fees pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1. Supreme Court denied the motions, and the son-in-law appealed.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?