Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bermuda Form

By Jared Zola and Lisa M. Campisi
December 01, 2016

Many Fortune 500 companies' product liability insurance programs use the Bermuda Form to insure alleged bodily injury and property damage. The Bermuda Form has many characteristics distinct from standard commercial general liability (CGL) policies. Knowing its intricacies is essential for any coverage lawyer involved in large-scale coverage analysis and disputes.

When product and general liability insurance markets tightened in the mid-1980s, insurers designed the Bermuda Form to maintain the key features of traditional occurrence coverage and add additional features in an attempt to eliminate what insurers viewed as growing exposures and risks. Among these newly added features unique to the Bermuda Form are the so-called “integrated occurrence” provisions. Under traditional occurrence-based policies, where there is continuing injury or damage over many years, coverage is often owed on multiple policies spanning many policy years. By instead of funneling similar third-party claims into a single policy year through an “integration” process, the Bermuda Form sought to provide a more insurer-friendly construct.

Most versions of the Bermuda Form require a policyholder to formally “declare” an “integrated occurrence” when providing notice to the insurer. Whether to do so, and how to do so in a way that will capture the appropriate claims and yet not inadvertently cast too wide a net, raises many thorny considerations. Additionally, while the Bermuda Form permits a retroactive declaration that an occurrence is integrated after it had previously been declared a single occurrence, doing so likewise raises several issues that require careful consideration.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.