Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Abbott Laboratories' $5.8 billion proposed purchase of Alere, a Massachusetts medical testing company, is in trouble now that multiple criminal allegations have been leveled against Alere. Abbott, apparently now reluctant, reportedly offered Alere around $50 million to release it from its agreement. Alere declined the offer, then claimed in an August 2016 suit that Abbott was dragging its feet due to a severe case of buyer's remorse.
The problems appear to stem from several legal actions now threatening Alere. The first sign of trouble came on Feb. 26, 2016, when Alere announced that it would delay the filing of its annual 10-K form with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) because of concerns over its revenue recognition practices in Africa and China. The delayed form, finally filed in August 2016, contained little of major concern to the markets, but it did reveal the company's independent auditor's conclusion that Alere had not been maintaining effective internal controls over its financial reporting process. The company's August 2016 filing also showed revised financial results for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and three quarters of 2015.
That did not end Alere's troubles for the year, however, because the Department of Justice (DOJ) handed the company two criminal subpoenas, one related to sales on other continents and the other alleging violations of federal health care and anti-kickback laws. In addition, Alere and its subsidiary, Arriva Medical, are under investigation by the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee concerning possible improper claims submitted to Medicare and Medicaid.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?