Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
No Eviction
In a recent decision from a court in South Florida, a judge ruled a long-term commercial tenant could not be evicted for non-payment of fees for services provided by the landlord where the latter had apparently retaliated against the tenant for making complaints about that service.
The tenant, Miami Juice Corp., entered into a lease with LSB Investment Corp. in 2009 to operate a healthy-food restaurant in the landlord's Sunny Isles Beach shopping plaza. The lease was for a term of five years, with four renewal options of five years each. These options could be exercised by giving the landlord notice in writing. The tenant exercised the first of these options in 2014, but did so verbally.
Part of the agreement was that the landlord would provide valet parking services to the tenant's customers. Miami Juice found the service deficient, however, complaining to the landlord that its staff lost customers' keys, damaged their vehicles and permitted people not patronizing the shopping center to take up valuable parking spaces. In its suit against the landlord, Miami Juice claimed that rather than fixing these problems, the landlord instructed the valet parking staff to turn the restaurant's customers away, and had Miami Juice customers' cars towed away if they managed to self-park in the lot. When Miami Juice stopped paying for the valet service, LSB served the restaurant's owner with an eviction letter.
The landlord counter-sued, claiming Miami Juice did not properly renew its lease and had, at any rate, breached the agreement by not paying for valet services.
Following a three-day trial, Judge Thomas Rebull determined that Miami Juice had renewed the lease by verbal agreement, and that LSB had accepted the renewal despite the lack of a writing.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.