Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

David vs. Goliath

By M. Rosie Rees and Tamara K. Hibbard
February 01, 2017

The head of leasing for your new client, a regional restaurant chain, calls to say he has received a request from the owner of a 70-acre regional enclosed mall shopping center to sign an estoppel certificate. The certificate references your client's ground lease for its 8,000 square-foot restaurant on a 1.3-acre outparcel at the center. The estoppel request appears to be in connection with the sale of the shopping center. You think your client just needs help filling out the certificate, but instead, he asks, “What do I need to do to exercise my right of first refusal to buy the leased premises?”

He sends you the ground lease. In it you find the following right of first refusal provision:

Should Lessor, during the lease term, desire to sell the Leased Premises, Lessee shall have a right of first refusal to meet any bona fide offer of sale on the same terms and conditions of such offer, and on failure to meet such bona fide offer within fifteen (15) days after written notice of the offer from Lessor, Lessor shall be free to sell the Leased Premises to such third person in accordance with the terms and conditions of such person's offer.

Sounds pretty simple, right? Your client just has to notify the owner within 15 days that it wants to buy the outparcel. But as you begin crafting the notice, you realize this deceptively simple provision has left a great many questions unanswered.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.