Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Institutions that maintain and manage securities accounts for businesses and other customers perform a critical function for the securities and lending industries. These intermediaries, consisting primarily of investment managers, broker-dealers and banks, manage more than $62 trillion in assets for both individual and institutional clients. In so doing, they enable customers to hold and borrow against investment property. See Amicus Brief of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Forest Capital v. Blackrock, No. 15-1551 (4th Cir. Sept. 21, 2015), at 1 (ECF No. 28-1).
UCC Article 8 provides what has been described as the “modern legal structure” for the system of holding securities through intermediaries. And through the interaction of Articles 8 and 9, the UCC both governs and facilitates the use of securities as collateral for obtaining credit. Note, UCC § 8-102(a)(14) defines a “securities intermediary” as a clearing corporation or a “person … that in the ordinary course of its business maintains securities accounts for others and is acting in that capacity.” U.C.C. § 8-102.
For the system to function smoothly, securities intermediaries and their customers need clarity as to their mutual obligations. Id. These obligations are usually spelled out in agreements between the securities intermediary and their customer, but they are also subject to Articles 8 and 9. However, they have not always meshed seamlessly when it comes to the duties of securities intermediaries.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.