Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Report Names 2016's Judicial 'Hellholes'
The American Tort Reform Association issued its annual “judicial hellholes” report on Dec. 15, 2016. As per usual, New York City was near the top of the list, beat out for top billing by the City of St. Louis (2016's worst “hellhole”) and the entire State of California. Several other jurisdictions and courts were also named, such as Madison, IL, the Florida Supreme Court and the area of South Florida, where, according to the report, “aggressive personal injury lawyers wait like hungry gators to seize upon the litigation opportunities the [Florida] high court so predictably provides.”
Responding to the report's publication in a written statement, Linda Lipsen, the CEO of the American Association for Justice, a group made up of plaintiff lawyers, called the annual report a “publicity stunt” that has been “ridiculed, debunked, and exposed as nothing more than propaganda paid for by corporations seeking to evade accountability for wrongdoing.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?