Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Department of Labor (DOL) is asking an administrative law judge to order the company to turn over information on job and salary history for employees including starting salary, starting position, starting job level and other “snapshot” information from Sept. 1 2014 and Sept. 2015 along with names and contact information for employees.
The department said that “unless restrained by an administrative order, Google will continue to violate its obligations.” It requested that the administrative law judge compel Google to comply, or else issue an order cancelling the company's contracts and subcontracts and barring the company from entering into future contracts.
In response to the claims, Google said in an emailed statement that it did not reveal the data because of the belief that requests were too broad, and asked for confidential information.
The DOL did not immediately provide comment on the suit, but in a statement, OFCCP Acting Director Thomas M. Dowd said that Google had “many opportunities” to produce pay data voluntarily. “We filed this lawsuit so we can obtain the information we need to complete our evaluation,” he said.
In an emailed statement provided by a spokesperson, Google said it has “worked hard to comply” with the compliance program office's current audit and provided “hundreds of thousands of records” in the last year.
“However, the handful of OFCCP requests that are the subject of the complaint are overbroad in scope, or reveal confidential data, and we've made this clear to the OFCCP, to no avail,” the statement said. “These requests include thousands of employees' private contact information which we safeguard rigorously.”
The labor department complaint comes amid heightened scrutiny of Silicon Valley employment practices. In recent years, some high-tech corporations have been criticized for employing disproportionately low numbers of African-Americans, Latinos and women. In September 2016, the labor department filed a lawsuit against Palantir Technologies, for example, accusing the company of systematically discriminating against Asian job applicants.
The Labor Department's federal contract office informed Google in September 2015 that it had chosen the company's Mountain View, California headquarters for a random audit, which the tech giant refused, according to the complaint. The office asked for job and salary history from employees, under Executive Order 11246, which outlaws pay discrimination for federal contractors and requires them to permit the Labor Department to examine its books and records for compliance.
The complaint also cited the Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act and the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibit contractors from discriminating against veterans and the disabled, respectively.
Two Jackson Lewis partners, Matthew Camardella and Daniel Duff III confirmed that they are representing Google in the matter.
***** Rebekah Mintzer writes for Corporate Counsel, our ALM sibling. She can be reached at [email protected].
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.