Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<i>Online Extra</i><br>DOL Sues Google Over Failure to Provide Compensation Data
The Department of Labor (DOL) is asking an administrative law judge to order the company to turn over information on job and salary history for employees including starting salary, starting position, starting job level and other “snapshot” information from Sept. 1 2014 and Sept. 2015 along with names and contact information for employees.
The department said that “unless restrained by an administrative order, Google will continue to violate its obligations.” It requested that the administrative law judge compel Google to comply, or else issue an order cancelling the company's contracts and subcontracts and barring the company from entering into future contracts.
In response to the claims, Google said in an emailed statement that it did not reveal the data because of the belief that requests were too broad, and asked for confidential information.
The DOL did not immediately provide comment on the suit, but in a statement, OFCCP Acting Director Thomas M. Dowd said that Google had “many opportunities” to produce pay data voluntarily. “We filed this lawsuit so we can obtain the information we need to complete our evaluation,” he said.
In an emailed statement provided by a spokesperson, Google said it has “worked hard to comply” with the compliance program office's current audit and provided “hundreds of thousands of records” in the last year.
“However, the handful of OFCCP requests that are the subject of the complaint are overbroad in scope, or reveal confidential data, and we've made this clear to the OFCCP, to no avail,” the statement said. “These requests include thousands of employees' private contact information which we safeguard rigorously.”
The labor department complaint comes amid heightened scrutiny of Silicon Valley employment practices. In recent years, some high-tech corporations have been criticized for employing disproportionately low numbers of African-Americans, Latinos and women. In September 2016, the labor department filed a lawsuit against Palantir Technologies, for example, accusing the company of systematically discriminating against Asian job applicants.
The Labor Department's federal contract office informed Google in September 2015 that it had chosen the company's Mountain View, California headquarters for a random audit, which the tech giant refused, according to the complaint. The office asked for job and salary history from employees, under Executive Order 11246, which outlaws pay discrimination for federal contractors and requires them to permit the Labor Department to examine its books and records for compliance.
The complaint also cited the Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act and the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibit contractors from discriminating against veterans and the disabled, respectively.
Two Jackson Lewis partners, Matthew Camardella and Daniel Duff III confirmed that they are representing Google in the matter.
***** Rebekah Mintzer writes for Corporate Counsel, our ALM sibling. She can be reached at [email protected].
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.