Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Post-Confirmation Jurisdictional Shrinkage
Everything has to come to an end, sometime. — L. Frank Baum, The Marvelous Land of Oz
A case under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code is commenced upon the filing of a “petition” for relief and may be “closed” after a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization or liquidation is “confirmed” and the bankruptcy estate has been “fully administered.” See 11 U.S.C. §§ 301, 350. In recent years, the pace of bankruptcy cases has accelerated. Cases are being filed and plans of reorganization or liquidation are being confirmed within months of filing. The post-confirmation period to administer the confirmed plan, however, often through the use of post-confirmation vehicles such as litigation, creditor or liquidation trusts, may take many years to complete. As a result, the scope of a bankruptcy court's subject matter jurisdiction after confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan, often referred to as “post-confirmation jurisdiction,” is becoming increasingly relevant. Although Congress has not expressly addressed when and under what circumstances bankruptcy jurisdiction ends, most courts agree that a bankruptcy court's jurisdiction “shrinks” after confirmation of a plan. This article discusses the factors that courts take into consideration in determining the extent of the post-confirmation jurisdictional shrinkage.
Bankruptcy Courts' Broad Pre-Confirmation Jurisdiction
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?