Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Tax Foreclosures: Notice to Mortgagees

By Stewart E. Sterk
February 01, 2017

Tax foreclosures implicate not only the interest of the delinquent fee owner, but also the interest of the holder of a mortgage on the fee interest. What happens when the mortgagee does not know about the tax delinquency, the tax foreclosure, or the expiration of the right to redeem the property? The Second Department recently confronted that issue in Matter of East West Bank v. L & L Associates Holding Corp. (NYLJ 11/28/16, p. 24., col. 4), and concluded that further discovery was needed to sort out the competing rights of the mortgagee and the purchaser of the tax lien on the property. Complicating the issue in Matter of East West Bank was the way the mortgagee acquired its interest: The original mortgagee was a failed bank, and the successor mortgagee obtained the mortgage through an assignment from the FDIC.

The East West Case

Roslyn Jane Holdings, LLC, the fee owner of commercial property in Nassau County, obtained a mortgage loan from United Commercial Bank (UCB). The California Department of Financial Institutions closed UCB in 2009, and the FDIC was appointed as UCB's receiver. In November 2009, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with East West, under the terms of which East West acquired the note, the mortgage, and all other documents related to the loan. The FDIC delivered the assignment more than four years later, in April, 2014. East West recorded the note and mortgage on June 2, 2014.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

"Holy Fair Use, Batman": Copyright, Fair Use and the Dark Knight Image

The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.