Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Hospital Ordered to Produce Records It Claims Don't Exist
New York's Supreme Court, Clinton County, has ordered a hospital to produce records documenting the number of surgeries performed by a doctor even though the hospital claimed that, because the requested records do not exist, it would have to create documents in order to comply. Sawyer v. Abodeely, 53 Misc. 3d 1220(A); 2016 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4528, *; 2016 NY Slip Op 51753(U), **.
Plaintiff Lance Sawyer alleged that the sigmoid colectomy Dr. Abodeely performed on him to treat his gastrointestinal issues was not a necessary procedure. Sawyer wanted to know how many of the same or similar procedures his doctor, Dr. Abodeely, had performed in the recent past. The doctor said he was unable to estimate that number, so he directed the plaintiff to obtain the records from the hospital's database. Sawyer therefore served the hospital with a notice of discovery and inspection.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?