Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The work letter agreement of the lease (the “Work Letter”) sets forth the rights and obligations of the landlord and the tenant relating to the construction of improvements at the leased premises. For both landlord and tenant, the areas of concern will vary, depending on, among other things, whether the building in which the premises is located already exists or is under construction, and which party is responsible for the payment and performance of the base building work and tenant improvements. During the parties' preparation and negotiation of the lease agreement, various construction-related issues will inevitably need to be considered and addressed by both landlord and tenant.
To help anticipate problems and mitigate associated risks, this two-part article summarizes six “what if” scenarios that should be considered by landlords and tenants when negotiating Work Letters.
1. What if the Building Does Not Support the Tenant's Improvement Requirements?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?