Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

David Boies' Film Venture Sues over <i>Jane</i> Financing

By Meghan Tribe
April 02, 2017

The Boies/Schiller Film Group (BSFG), a film finance venture founded by renowned litigator David Boies and Zachary Schiller, a son of Boies Schiller Flexner co-founder and managing partner Jonathan Schiller, has filed suit against investor Peter Nathaniel and his Boca Raton, FL-based investment fund Impala Partners LLC. Boies/Schiller Film Group v. Impala Partners LLC, 502017CA002867.

The lawsuit in Palm Beach County Circuit Court accuses Nathaniel and Impala of misrepresentations that resulted in BSFG losing millions in its production of Jane Got a Gun, a 2016 film starring Natalie Portman that received middling reviews and underwhelmed at the box office.

Boies Schiller litigation partners Stephen Zack and Tyler Ulrich in Miami are representing BSFG in the suit, along with Gregory Coleman, a name partner at West Palm Beach's Critton Luttier & Coleman.

Since being founded in 2012, BSFG has had a hand in producing several mid-level wide release films such as Escape Plan, an action thriller supported by Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger, and Midnight Sun, a romance featuring Bella Thorne and Schwarzenegger's son Patrick. Last year, BSFG made headlines by agreeing to fund a new film based on long-running reality television series COPS.

Jane Got a Gun, an ill-conceived Western that starred Portman as Jane Hammond, a farmer's wife who enlists the help of her ex-lover to defend her home and save her life from a gang, was plagued with issues from the very beginning. There were numerous cast changes, as actors Bradley Cooper, Michael Fassbender and Jude Law all dropped out of the project, as did the film's first director, Lynne Ramsey.

But in 2013, BSFG and Boies — who loves Westerns — rode to the rescue.

According to BSFG's complaint, Impala and Nathanial, who had previously invested in Jane along with Stone Village Productions, began arranging for the financing of the film and approached BSFG about providing “gap” funding for the project in January 2013. BSFG agreed to provide $1.75 million, subject to certain conditions, but by mid-March that number had increased to $2 million, the complaint alleges.

On March 14, 2013, Nathanial met with David Boies in New York — as the famous litigator prepared to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court against California's ultimately overturned Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage — to ask for an additional $8 million to fund Jane. The BSFG lawsuit claims that once BSFG provided the funds, Nathanial and Impala would then provide the additional funding to get the movie made and distributed.

“Although there was nothing at the time to suggest that those promises and representations were false, it is now clear that Nathanial and Impala never intended to provide the financing that they promised,” BSFG alleges.

BSFG claims it would end up pouring more cash into Jane in addition to the $8 million it had already invested. The film finance firm further claims it made two more investments in the project — in installments of $9 million and $8.5 million — due to its reliance on Nathanial and Impala's repeated assertions that they had the necessary assets to produce Jane.

By the time the credits rolled on Jane, BSFG claims it had contributed a total of $20.625 million of the film's estimated $25 million budget. BSFG hired Gavin O'Conner to direct the movie and brought on The Weinstein Co. to co-release the film with Relativity Media LLC. But Jane grossed only $830,000 in its opening week and the film earned only about $1.5 million in its limited release.

BSFG seeks money and punitive damages from Impala and Nathanial. Calls to the defendants were unreturned by the time this article was written.

*****
Meghan Tribe
writes for The American Lawyer, an ALM sibling of Entertainment Law & Finance.

The Boies/Schiller Film Group (BSFG), a film finance venture founded by renowned litigator David Boies and Zachary Schiller, a son of Boies Schiller Flexner co-founder and managing partner Jonathan Schiller, has filed suit against investor Peter Nathaniel and his Boca Raton, FL-based investment fund Impala Partners LLC. Boies/Schiller Film Group v. Impala Partners LLC, 502017CA002867.

The lawsuit in Palm Beach County Circuit Court accuses Nathaniel and Impala of misrepresentations that resulted in BSFG losing millions in its production of Jane Got a Gun, a 2016 film starring Natalie Portman that received middling reviews and underwhelmed at the box office.

Boies Schiller litigation partners Stephen Zack and Tyler Ulrich in Miami are representing BSFG in the suit, along with Gregory Coleman, a name partner at West Palm Beach's Critton Luttier & Coleman.

Since being founded in 2012, BSFG has had a hand in producing several mid-level wide release films such as Escape Plan, an action thriller supported by Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger, and Midnight Sun, a romance featuring Bella Thorne and Schwarzenegger's son Patrick. Last year, BSFG made headlines by agreeing to fund a new film based on long-running reality television series COPS.

Jane Got a Gun, an ill-conceived Western that starred Portman as Jane Hammond, a farmer's wife who enlists the help of her ex-lover to defend her home and save her life from a gang, was plagued with issues from the very beginning. There were numerous cast changes, as actors Bradley Cooper, Michael Fassbender and Jude Law all dropped out of the project, as did the film's first director, Lynne Ramsey.

But in 2013, BSFG and Boies — who loves Westerns — rode to the rescue.

According to BSFG's complaint, Impala and Nathanial, who had previously invested in Jane along with Stone Village Productions, began arranging for the financing of the film and approached BSFG about providing “gap” funding for the project in January 2013. BSFG agreed to provide $1.75 million, subject to certain conditions, but by mid-March that number had increased to $2 million, the complaint alleges.

On March 14, 2013, Nathanial met with David Boies in New York — as the famous litigator prepared to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court against California's ultimately overturned Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage — to ask for an additional $8 million to fund Jane. The BSFG lawsuit claims that once BSFG provided the funds, Nathanial and Impala would then provide the additional funding to get the movie made and distributed.

“Although there was nothing at the time to suggest that those promises and representations were false, it is now clear that Nathanial and Impala never intended to provide the financing that they promised,” BSFG alleges.

BSFG claims it would end up pouring more cash into Jane in addition to the $8 million it had already invested. The film finance firm further claims it made two more investments in the project — in installments of $9 million and $8.5 million — due to its reliance on Nathanial and Impala's repeated assertions that they had the necessary assets to produce Jane.

By the time the credits rolled on Jane, BSFG claims it had contributed a total of $20.625 million of the film's estimated $25 million budget. BSFG hired Gavin O'Conner to direct the movie and brought on The Weinstein Co. to co-release the film with Relativity Media LLC. But Jane grossed only $830,000 in its opening week and the film earned only about $1.5 million in its limited release.

BSFG seeks money and punitive damages from Impala and Nathanial. Calls to the defendants were unreturned by the time this article was written.

*****
Meghan Tribe
writes for The American Lawyer, an ALM sibling of Entertainment Law & Finance.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.