Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Off-Label Suit
In the case of Caltagirone v. Cephalon, Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Denis P. Cohen has granted the plaintiff the right to subpoena documents concerning pharmaceuticals manufacturer Cephalon from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern Dirstrict of Pennsylvania. The civil suit is being brought by a man who claims his son's methadone overdose can be traced back to an addiction he developed from using Cephalon's fentanyl-laced lollipops, marketed under the name Actiq. Although these lollipops were approved for use only by cancer patients who had been prescribed them for pain relief by oncologists specially trained in dealing with Schedule II opioids, the plaintiff contends that Cephalon sales representatives marketed Actiq to doctors for a number of other uses, including the relief of migraine headaches. Among these, according to the claim, was the plaintiff's decedent's doctor, who prescribed Actiq to him for treatment of migraines in 2005. The plaintiff's decedent became addicted, states the claim, and after consuming nearly 6,000 lollipops between 2005 and 2011, he began taking methadone to combat the addiction. The son died of a methadone overdose in May 2014.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.