Call 855-808-4530 or email GroupSales@alm.com to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In today's global economy, manufacturing and distribution chains typically are spread across multiple countries. A product now passes through several (and sometimes related) companies as it is sold and resold overseas before possibly being imported back into the United States. This dynamic and complex relationship from the incarnation of product to eventual world-wide sale often creates tension with U.S. laws that regulate domestic conduct.
Intellectual property laws, which are central to innovation, product development and protection, are no stranger to this tension. IP owners naturally want to assert their rights to exclude others, and when necessary, identify potential liability and maximize damages relating to foreign activity. But accused infringers try to resist this “reach” to ensure a U.S. IP-acquired right does not surreptitiously become world-wide protection, especially when no equivalent foreign protection exists, or it is weakly enforced. Recent U.S. cases have created benchmarks of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret liability for foreign activity, and businesses should take heed.
The U.S. Patent Claw
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at customercare@alm.com or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?